Sex Education for Primary school....

[TheOutdoorThreadmill]

"She has her knickers in a twist about liking posts, you naughty boy "

That was replying to Doggy not Dan.

That's not what I expected you to do. If you wanted to stay neutral on this, that would be absolutely fine with me. But you decided to like his post, and then to mock me for taking issue with it, and to make his behaviour my issue to deal with, again.

At the risk of repeating myself, he made 4 statements in that one post.

Your solution to everything shitty thing that is said to me on here is that I should ignore it/I should put them on ignore.

Why not, I have an ignore list a mile long and it works perfectly well for me

Why is it never "maybe other posters shouldn't be such pricks"?

Like you did with Curtis? Ah okay.

 

[Matlock]

That was replying to Doggy not Dan.

It was still mocking me.

At the risk of repeating myself, he made 4 statements in that one post.

At the risk of repeating myself, you had a choice not to endorse it.

Why not, I have an ignore list a mile long and it works perfectly well for me

Because it makes it my issue to deal with someone else's bad behaviour.

Like you did with Curtis? Ah okay.

I never liked any of his posts about you. I never mocked you about it. It's an entirely false equivalence.

 

[DeepThroat]

No worries. Good to know that comments about my kids are acceptable to you.

Also to @wat_boy and @Dogwide I see.

Stay classy lads.

The post in question made an oblique reference to what I now assume is your pet name for your kids.

Not everyone who read that post would make that connection as the reply wasn't even to one of your posts, and it coild easily have read as referring to a generic 'type' and not an individual.

The statement in the post was about the Cass Report and that was what the likes were for.

 

[Matlock]

The post in question made an oblique reference to what I now assume is your pet name for your kids.

Not everyone who read that post would make that connection as the reply wasn't even to one of your posts, and it coild easily have read as referring to a generic 'type' and not an individual.

The statement in the post was about the Cass Report and that was what the likes were for.

Fair enough. I appreciate the response.

 

[TheRebelRoar]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1867369073719300258

 

[DeepThroat]

Baroness Cass: MPs against puberty blockers ban 'misunderstand' facts

Baroness Hilary Cass, who wrote Cass Review into children's gender care, said there is no evidence puberty blockers help with body image or mood after Wes Streeting announced 'indefinite' ban on drugs.

www.dailymail.co.uk

She doubles down on what puberty blockers should be used for, and again debunks the 'Saves Lives' mantra.

No radical comments yet but a few sensible ones that don't seem framed by either extreme of this argument.