Sex Education for Primary school....

[Matlock]

That was replying to Doggy not Dan.

It was still mocking me.

At the risk of repeating myself, he made 4 statements in that one post.

At the risk of repeating myself, you had a choice not to endorse it.

Why not, I have an ignore list a mile long and it works perfectly well for me

Because it makes it my issue to deal with someone else's bad behaviour.

Like you did with Curtis? Ah okay.

I never liked any of his posts about you. I never mocked you about it. It's an entirely false equivalence.

 

[DeepThroat]

No worries. Good to know that comments about my kids are acceptable to you.

Also to @wat_boy and @Dogwide I see.

Stay classy lads.

The post in question made an oblique reference to what I now assume is your pet name for your kids.

Not everyone who read that post would make that connection as the reply wasn't even to one of your posts, and it coild easily have read as referring to a generic 'type' and not an individual.

The statement in the post was about the Cass Report and that was what the likes were for.

 

[Matlock]

The post in question made an oblique reference to what I now assume is your pet name for your kids.

Not everyone who read that post would make that connection as the reply wasn't even to one of your posts, and it coild easily have read as referring to a generic 'type' and not an individual.

The statement in the post was about the Cass Report and that was what the likes were for.

Fair enough. I appreciate the response.

 

[TheRebelRoar]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1867369073719300258

 

[DeepThroat]

Baroness Cass: MPs against puberty blockers ban 'misunderstand' facts

Baroness Hilary Cass, who wrote Cass Review into children's gender care, said there is no evidence puberty blockers help with body image or mood after Wes Streeting announced 'indefinite' ban on drugs.

www.dailymail.co.uk

She doubles down on what puberty blockers should be used for, and again debunks the 'Saves Lives' mantra.

No radical comments yet but a few sensible ones that don't seem framed by either extreme of this argument.

 

[DeepThroat]

Gynaecologist is suspended for refusing to treat a trans patient

Dr Victor Acharian (pictured) refused to see the 26-year-old patient, who attended the gynaecological appointment with her boyfriend, in August 2023.

www.dailymail.co.uk

TLDR

Dr offers to refer patient to a physcian better qualified to treat them

Patient's boyfriend drops nasty review on Google

Dr responds that he is only qualified to treat 'Real Women'

Dr gets cancelled

 

[Chara021]

Gynaecologist is suspended for refusing to treat a trans patient

Dr Victor Acharian (pictured) refused to see the 26-year-old patient, who attended the gynaecological appointment with her boyfriend, in August 2023.

www.dailymail.co.uk

TLDR

Dr offers to refer patient to a physcian better qualified to treat them

Patient's boyfriend drops nasty review on Google

Dr responds that he is only qualified to treat 'Real Women'

Dr gets cancelled

I presume the trans patient had their ' bits' re organised considering they were looking for treatment from a gynae.

Begs the question what did they need treatment for? Does a mock-ee- ah vagina have the same problems as a real one? ?

I think the Dr. was perfectly correct to refer the trans person. I would imagine it requires a specialist physician to treat a trans.

The Whole thing could be a crock of crap and the trans and their boyfriend were just looking to be outraged. Or just pushing the boundaries.

What's really wrong though is the Dr. getting suspended. Seems to me he dealth with the situation very professionally. And if he simply wasn't comfortable or confident in treating the trans patient he should have been allowed to step back if he so wished.

 

[DeepThroat]

I presume the trans patient had their ' bits' re organised considering they were looking for treatment from a gynae.

Begs the question what did they need treatment for? Does a mock-ee- ah vagina have the same problems as a real one? ?

I think the Dr. was perfectly correct to refer the trans person. I would imagine it requires a specialist physician to treat a trans.

The Whole thing could be a crock of crap and the trans and their boyfriend were just looking to be outraged. Or just pushing the boundaries.

What's really wrong though is the Dr. getting suspended. Seems to me he dealth with the situation very professionally. And if he simply wasn't comfortable or confident in treating the trans patient he should have been allowed to step back if he so wished.

Initially I assumed they had their 'bits' rearranged, but thinking about it, I think they may not have.

If they had they would be complaining that they had a vagina and were refused treatment. They didn't

The Dr of course can't comment.

But even if they had the surgery, below the hood problems so to speak they would be better served by a Urologist to sort out any urnination problems, or external issues with the Plastic Surgeon

 

[Chara021]

Initially I assumed they had their 'bits' rearranged, but thinking about it, I think they may not have.

If they had they would be complaining that they had a vagina and were refused treatment. They didn't

The Dr of course can't comment.

But even if they had the surgery, below the hood problems so to speak they would be better served by a Urologist to sort out any urnination problems, or external issues with the Plastic Surgeon

Well if they didn't get surgery transforming their tackle it makes the whole event even worse. What was a gynae supposed to do with that! ?

 

[The High King]

Well if they didn't get surgery transforming their tackle it makes the whole event even worse. What was a gynae supposed to do with that! ?

Prostate check.