Sex Education for Primary school....

[TheRebelRoar]

No it doesn't, and as I said I'm not here to moderate this forum or dictate who posts what.

Lol is that what she's saying now.

No one who is being honest would wish this for their kids.

Making out that it is some terrible wrong to say the same is pure bollocks.

 

[Matlock]

Yerrah go on outta that, the amount of shite Ian Curtis used throw at me about my kids, all complete lies and I never heard a peep out of you. You never saw me crying about it.
Stop taking this place so serious.

Did I ever like a post of his doing that?

Did I ever mock you about that?

We both know I didn't.

 

[Matlock]

Lol is that what she's saying now.

No one who is being honest would wish this for their kids.

Making out that it is some terrible wrong to say the same is pure bollocks.

Again, remember your big tantrum when I suggested that your kid might not be let listen to Taylor Swift. Because it was so terrible that your kid was mentioned on here.

But now apparently its fine for you to post about my kids?

You are such a hypocrite.

 

[Blue Jasmin]

Just pointing out the absolute hypocrisy of Dan having a tantrum about his kids being mentioned on here, but thinking it is fine to mention my kids.

And also the hypocrisy of the posters who approved of that comment.

Certain posters on here automatically like every post of Rebelroar no matter what the content, Pavlov's dog comes to mind.

 

[TheRebelRoar]

Certain posters on here automatically like every post of Rebelroar no matter what the content, Pavlov's dog comes to mind.

Leave the cake inspiring canines out of this.

 

[TheOutdoorThreadmill]

Did I ever like a post of his doing that?

Did I ever mock you about that?

We both know I didn't.

Did you ever reply to him with this?

"I agree with some of that, but maybe mentioning her kids is not ok".

Obviously his instead of hers.
Nope you didn't nor would I expect you to because I fully aware of how this forum operates and I have a very thick skin.

 

[Matlock]

Did you ever reply to him with this?

Obviously his instead of hers.

I don't think I have ever agreed with anything he posted.

I certainly never joked with him about it, as you are doing here with Dan.

 

[TheOutdoorThreadmill]

I certainly never joked with him about it, as you are doing here with Dan.

Where have I joked with Dan on this thread?

I don't think I have ever agreed with anything he posted.

Did you pull him, like you are expecting me to do?

 

[Matlock]

Where have I joked with Dan on this thread?

"She has her knickers in a twist about liking posts, you naughty boy "

Did you pull him, like you are expecting me to do?

That's not what I expected you to do. If you wanted to stay neutral on this, that would be absolutely fine with me. But you decided to like his post, and then to mock me for taking issue with it, and to make his behaviour my issue to deal with, again.

Your solution to everything shitty thing that is said to me on here is that I should ignore it/I should put them on ignore. Why is it never "maybe other posters shouldn't be such pricks"?

 

[TheOutdoorThreadmill]

"She has her knickers in a twist about liking posts, you naughty boy "

That was replying to Doggy not Dan.

That's not what I expected you to do. If you wanted to stay neutral on this, that would be absolutely fine with me. But you decided to like his post, and then to mock me for taking issue with it, and to make his behaviour my issue to deal with, again.

At the risk of repeating myself, he made 4 statements in that one post.

Your solution to everything shitty thing that is said to me on here is that I should ignore it/I should put them on ignore.

Why not, I have an ignore list a mile long and it works perfectly well for me

Why is it never "maybe other posters shouldn't be such pricks"?

Like you did with Curtis? Ah okay.