Hallbopping
Full Member
If the guest hasn’t been mentioned here already I’d be astonished.We’re only giving them ideas …
If the guest hasn’t been mentioned here already I’d be astonished.We’re only giving them ideas …
Just privatise it. Would bring a few bob in for the Exchequer (probably not too much as its prospects are not great). It could even involve stipulations around remaining free-to-air, a requirement to provide a balanced coverage of current affairs, and a commitment to keep George Lee off-screen..
They've not got their house in order.
The taxpayer should no longer be on the hook for this shambles of an operation. Bakhurst incapable of operating to a budget. Little better than sicknote Forbes.
If it cant fund itself then we shouldnt be propping up their increased spending.
Ffs he gave himself a raise lol
Just privatise it. Would bring a few bob in for the Exchequer (probably not too much as its prospects are not great). It could even involve stipulations around remaining free-to-air, a requirement to provide a balanced coverage of current affairs, and a commitment to keep George Lee off-screen..
Why would a private company buy a loss-making broadcaster, inherit all the public service obligations, and rely mainly on advertising revenue to make it work?Just privatise it. Would bring a few bob in for the Exchequer (probably not too much as its prospects are not great). It could even involve stipulations around remaining free-to-air, a requirement to provide a balanced coverage of current affairs, and a commitment to keep George Lee off-screen..
Why should the taxpayer subsidise a loss-making broadcaster? Many taxpayers do not avail of RTE or do not trust it. If it is losing money, it needs to cut its cost and/or improve its product. Giving that chap a three-year contract to front the LLS suggests the mandarins in RTE are playing it so safe. I read an interview with Brendan Balfe, a master broadcaster and a great voice, last week and he said he never listens to Radio One anymore, its content is so poor.Why would a private company buy a loss-making broadcaster, inherit all the public service obligations, and rely mainly on advertising revenue to make it work?
They might have an interest in parts of RTÉ, but buying the whole thing as-is makes little commercial sense. Reform it by all means, but privatisation isn’t a magic solution.
As I understand it, RTÉ are already outsourcing some of their productions.
Public services are not run on a for profit basis. I don’t avail of a medical card or social housing but my taxes go towards funding these services for those who do. We don’t get to pick what public services should be funded just because we don’t personally consume them ourselves.Why should the taxpayer subsidise a loss-making broadcaster? Many taxpayers do not avail of RTE or do not trust it. If it is losing money, it needs to cut its cost and/or improve its product. Giving that chap a three-year contract to front the LLS suggests the mandarins in RTE are playing it so safe. I read an interview with Brendan Balfe, a master broadcaster and a great voice, last week and he said he never listens to Radio One anymore, its content is so poor.
