Roy Butler/Covid Vaccine..

[Pontipine]

Narrative verdict at inquest into death of Roy Butler

A coroner has returned a narrative verdict at the inquest into the death of a 23-year-old Waterford man, who became ill and died five days after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine.

www.rte.ie

 

[slick fingers]

Narrative verdict at inquest into death of Roy Butler

A coroner has returned a narrative verdict at the inquest into the death of a 23-year-old Waterford man, who became ill and died five days after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine.

www.rte.ie

I still believe that if an independent pathologist with experience in vaccine injury had been involved, a different outcome would have been reached.

Terribly sad

 

[Matlock]

I still believe that if an independent pathologist with experience in vaccine injury had been involved, a different outcome would have been reached.

Terribly sad

Why?

 

[slick fingers]

Why?

A more experienced pathologist with expertise in this type of death would be more familiar with the injuries and could provide a stronger argument.

 

[hemlock666]

A more experienced pathologist with expertise in this type of death would be more familiar with the injuries and could provide a stronger argument.

"The Assistant State Pathologist, Dr Margot Bolster, told the inquest Mr Butler had died of a spontaneous and unexplained intracranial haemorrhage - a catastrophic brain bleed.

Dr Bolster has conducted more than 20,000 post-mortem examinations."

 

[slick fingers]

"The Assistant State Pathologist, Dr Margot Bolster, told the inquest Mr Butler had died of a spontaneous and unexplained intracranial haemorrhage - a catastrophic brain bleed.

Dr Bolster has conducted more than 20,000 post-mortem examinations."

How many post-mortem examinations has she conducted on people who suffered from vaccine-related injuries and on those who died from COVID-19?

 

[Browser Brody]

If the vaccine caused people to die by an intracerebral haemorrhage, then surely more people would have died by intracerebral haemorrhage !!

 

[Matlock]

A more experienced pathologist with expertise in this type of death would be more familiar with the injuries and could provide a stronger argument.

But you are basically saying that you are certain that the vaccine caused his death. That's what I am wondering about?

 

[Browser Brody]

A more experienced pathologist with expertise in this type of death would be more familiar with the injuries and could provide a stronger argument.

If this pathologist did rule the vaccine was the issue today, would you still be calling for a more experienced pathologist ?

 

[slick fingers]

But you are basically saying that you are certain that the vaccine caused his death. That's what I am wondering about?

No, I'm not 100% sure, but I think there's more than a 50% chance the vaccine played a role. In a trial against the HSE, could that be enough to make a strong case?