I assume you know the difference between thrombosis and haemorrhage--in this case Dr Bolster found an intracranial haemmorhage.I don’t doubt Dr. Bolster for one second, she's remarkable. But if autopsies were allowed on people who died from COVID, we might have found clearer links between the vaccine and certain health issues. In the UK, there have been similar cases, death caused by vaccine-induced immune thrombosis.
How is it that you feel you can state that with certainly when the state pathologist can't?It caused his death. He was unlucky that he was an absolute outlier but even though it can't be proved it did cause his death. I'm pro vaccine by the way. The risks were absolutely tiny but they are there. He won the death lottery.
It appears as if some want it to be his cause of death regardless of any evidence, or indeed lack of.How is it that you feel you can state that with certainly when the state pathologist can't?
For those the evidence must always fit into the rabbit holeIt appears as if some want it to be his cause of death regardless of any evidence, or indeed lack of.
Sure don't you know 2+2=5How is it that you feel you can state that with certainly when the state pathologist can't?
Yes I do know the the difference, thrombosis can cause pressure to build up in the brain which results in a haemorrhage.I assume you know the difference between thrombosis and haemorrhage--in this case Dr Bolster found an intracranial haemmorhage.
'Can' bring the operative word there.Yes I do know the the difference, thrombosis can cause pressure to build up in the brain which results in a haemorrhage.
'Can' bring the operative word there.
