Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="shez1987" data-source="post: 6969787" data-attributes="member: 13225">The complexion has kinda flipped around again. A month ago, I would have said the NFC was stronger, now I&#039;m not so sure. Dallas don&#039;t convince me at all. The Rams are loaded on paper, but look soft to me, and I wouldn&#039;t trust Stafford in a big spot. The Buccaneers have Brady but are beat up. The Cardinals will get players back, but they are still the Cardinals. The NFC has had no real depth to it this year, hence the Eagles (0-6 against teams with a winning record) earning a play-off spot. With Lance, the 49ers could be interesting, but they need to beat LA Rams just to get in. The AFC doesn&#039;t have a great team, but 7 good to very good ones. The potential matches between New England @ Buffalo, Indy @ Cincinnati and LA Chargers @ Kansas City would be extremely hard to call. Once New England or Buffalo don&#039;t win it, I&#039;m happy enough. Be nice to see Cincinnati go on a run.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="shez1987, post: 6969787, member: 13225"] The complexion has kinda flipped around again. A month ago, I would have said the NFC was stronger, now I'm not so sure. Dallas don't convince me at all. The Rams are loaded on paper, but look soft to me, and I wouldn't trust Stafford in a big spot. The Buccaneers have Brady but are beat up. The Cardinals will get players back, but they are still the Cardinals. The NFC has had no real depth to it this year, hence the Eagles (0-6 against teams with a winning record) earning a play-off spot. With Lance, the 49ers could be interesting, but they need to beat LA Rams just to get in. The AFC doesn't have a great team, but 7 good to very good ones. The potential matches between New England @ Buffalo, Indy @ Cincinnati and LA Chargers @ Kansas City would be extremely hard to call. Once New England or Buffalo don't win it, I'm happy enough. Be nice to see Cincinnati go on a run. [/QUOTE]

Verification