Missing woman in Youghal.

[Hallbopping]

Just a random thought and I’d be interested to hear what posters think.

Should we stop calling her Tina Satchwell? Does it give him a sense of ownership of her? Her name was Dingivan and would it not be better to hand her identity back to her own family?

 

[Corks finest]

I agree entirely. He was a bad egg.

Not sure about getting a ‘kick’ out of the chase, but he certainly manipulated the narrative. As they all do.

My comment that has caused consternation was simply based on the meeting of unfortunate circumstance.
Innocent / positive to begin with but turns sour. Largely because parties involved are damaged. And like I said, and I stand by this statement, it doesn’t always end well. Not victim blaming, just acknowledging a fact.

And I say this because I personally know how easy it is to become embroiled in something potentially dangerous……as a woman. I was such and I was lucky. But I wasnt married to the Fxxker and I was clever enough to a degree. To this day I know the circumstances saved me.

Point being in this case Satchwell absolutely sought out a vulnerable woman given her background. That’s what unsavoury/ damaged and murderous men do. That is my point. That’s where I am coming from.

He was /is a control freak

 

[Chara021]

Just a random thought and I’d be interested to hear what posters think.

Should we stop calling her Tina Satchwell? Does it give him a sense of ownership of her? Her name was Dingivan and would it not be better to hand her identity back to her own family?

TBF Hall I think it's only a name. Her family knows who she was and anyone close to her knows too. Her unfortunate connection to Satchwell doesn't really define her as a person.

As a case history though I reckon her married name will more than likely stick.

 

[JimmyBarrySmurph]

TBF Hall I think it's only a name. Her family knows who she was and anyone close to her knows too. Her unfortunate connection to Satchwell doesn't really define her as a person.

As a case history though I reckon her married name will more than likely stick.

This is a complex case. She fell out and was estranged from her family. I don’t know why that happened. You could logically say now that’s because of his supposed controlling behaviour. However, people become estranged for many reasons. A lot of info to come out of this case yet.

 

[Hallbopping]

TBF Hall I think it's only a name. Her family knows who she was and anyone close to her knows too. Her unfortunate connection to Satchwell doesn't really define her as a person.

As a case history though I reckon her married name will more than likely stick.

Good points. I was just curious to be honest, I do think it’s unfortunate though that in cases like these that the alleged murderer receives more attention than the victim. We know very little about Tina apart from what this asshole has said in interviews with Gardai.

 

[JimmyBarrySmurph]

Good points. I was just curious to be honest, I do think it’s unfortunate though that in cases like these that the alleged murderer receives more attention than the victim. We now very little about Tina apart from what this asshole has said in interviews with Gardai.

I hope in a way you are right.
If he tries to plead manslaughter, self defense or that he is the victim of DA then his legal team will have to tear her down and rip apart any fabric of dignity that she has left.
The undertones of that are there already

 

[Corks finest]

Just a random thought and I’d be interested to hear what posters think.

Should we stop calling her Tina Satchwell? Does it give him a sense of ownership of her? Her name was Dingivan and would it not be better to hand her identity back to her own family?

Believe me she was delighted to get away from that mad gang

 

[Clairecarebear]

Just a question for the large cross section on this forum, based on my own professional work.
If the roles were reversed, and would there be more belief for her being a victim of DA?
I am not offering an opinion either way, just simply asking the question.

 

[omar]

Just a question for the large cross section on this forum, based on my own professional work.
If the roles were reversed, and would there be more belief for her being a victim of DA?
I am not offering an opinion either way, just simply asking the question.

Yes, I'd imagine it would but wouldn't that simply be down to stats or averages when it comes to DA?

Having recently watched the Jason Corbett documentary it would also seem a strong form of defence for a female defendant?

 

[Gregory_Mike]

Just a question for the large cross section on this forum, based on my own professional work.
If the roles were reversed, and would there be more belief for her being a victim of DA?
I am not offering an opinion either way, just simply asking the question.

I would think so. However, if he were genuine, why didn't he just fess up and say it was self-defence/manslaughter?

The fact he buried her and told lie after lie both publicly and to AGS about her disappearance speaks volumes.