• A reminder that if you give a thumbs up or similarly positive reaction to a racist comment you may also receive a ban along with the user that wrote the post.

Keir Starmer

Story is that the Southport killer's father was wanted for genocide in Rwanda but was facilitated instead in getting away with it and settling in the UK by his lawyer - allegedly the bould Keir himself.

I'm not saying that is true (I have no idea - bear in mind I'm an anonymous person in the internet repeating third hand rumours from other anonymous Internet peeps) but that's the story.
Cheers
 
Well, it turns out it was all bollocks, no connection with Sir Keir


From the Mail :

'The judge, Mr Justice Collins, examined cases brought by six asylum seekers who were challenging parts of an immigration law brought in by Tony Blair’s government earlier that year.

All six were anonymised in the ruling. However, none of the six match the nationality and gender of Mr Rudakubana Sr, the Rwandan father of the Southport attacker who settled in the UK more than 20 years ago.

Sir Keir, who at the time was a senior human rights barrister at Left-wing Doughty Street Chambers, represented five of the six applicants.

The High Court document makes clear that Sir Keir's clients were a 16-year-old Ethiopian girl, a 26-year-old Iranian man and two Angolan men aged 22 and 33.'
 
Well.

I think he is pushing it as something it potentially isn't.
But then when you are grifting, truth doesn't matter.

It seems that Starmer is how the guy's family was in England in the first place.
I thought it seems Starmer isn't how this guys family was in England in the first place (looking 2 posts above yours)?

Still, what harm could possibly come from pushing some bullshit on the internet?
 
What's On Today

Live Music

Ballads & Banjos

The Welcome Inn, What's On Today @ 9:30 pm

More events ▼
Top