Right on cue, a right wing nut job.???![]()
All ran with same story, now why would Labour supporting outlets be trying to create a false equivalence? Take your time
![]()
Right on cue, a right wing nut job.???![]()
All ran with same story, now why would Labour supporting outlets be trying to create a false equivalence? Take your time
![]()
Post there since yesterday, lunchtime. Clearly, the vice like grip I have you in, you must have missed it.Right on cue, a right wing nut job.???
Turns out £20k of it was for his son to use Waheed Ali's apartment in London to give his son a quiet place to study for exams, because the press were surrounding his house and disturbing them so badly. It look like a lot of money because that apartment is worth £18M and Starmer used a calculated open market value of what it would theoretically cost to rent that space within that luxury apartment. Part of that declaration was using the apartment for filming a Christmas message during the tail end of Covid.There are four really, really important aspects to this story which a lot of media reporting on this are glossing over:
1. 40% of it is in football tickets. He's an Arsenal season ticket holder, but sensibly, they don't let him sit in the stands, so they give him a hospitality seat instead. He declares it regardless, rightly, but it's only needed because he's a massive political figure with potential risk of attack. The same dynamic is true of events in general, as leader of the opposition, he should be attending events, he's not absolutely loaded unlike a number of recent former PMs
2. If he had been a minister in the government, he wouldn't have had to declare the vast majority of what he's declared as it would have been allowable as part of doing state business. It only needs to be declared because he's in opposition.
3. He's declared everything and nothing has actually been highlighted as a problem, he has been investigated (in 2022) and cleared previously.
4. Holy shitballs the Tories were an absolute disgrace on this front. As an example of one, the prime minister gets £30k to refurbish his accommodation in Downing St. This was not enough for Boris Johnson, he spent £112,549 in 2020 alone, he got Tory donors to pay for it. But didn't declare it because he apparently lost his phone and could no longer remember the specific details when investigated.
Same excuse he and Rishi Sunak made to the Covid enquiry...
I think there's a few bits that are probably a little questionable, the glasses donation isn't great, but the vast, vast majority of it is horseshit.
There's a reason why the shadow culture is number 2 on the list.
This is a pure hatchet job by the press.
Bad optics and something for all the right-wing media outlets to go mad about but nothing in reality.Turns out £20k of it was for his son to use Waheed Ali's apartment in London to give his son a quiet place to study for exams, because the press were surrounding his house and disturbing them so badly. It look like a lot of money because that apartment is worth £18M and Starmer used a calculated open market value of what it would theoretically cost to rent that space within that luxury apartment. Part of that declaration was using the apartment for filming a Christmas message during the tail end of Covid.
I mean, FFS, the fact that he actually declared this as an official donation is very, very telling. The clothes and glasses looks a bit crap (although I would imagine the leader of the opposition could really use a bunch of nice expensive suits in the run up to the election...) but other than that it's a total nothingburger.
Starmer came up with a great reply on Sky:
Presumably no politicians will be going to any future media hospitality events now...
Bad optics and something for all the right-wing media outlets to go mad about but nothing in reality.
They did not bother scrutinising Boris Johnson and and the billions £££ taxpayers cash given out in daft contracts to their chums at the time of Covid-19.


They really will say anything to get to the top and sometimes for cash.![]()
Potential Conservative Leadership Candidate Robert Jenrick Blames Donation from Dormant Firm On Administrative Error
The MP reported a donation from a company that appears to be inactive in the UK – which his team has now told Byline Times was a mistakebylinetimes.com
Breaking electoral laws by accepting donation from a company that had been dormant for 7 years. Not fishy at all.
Also accepted £12k donation from Richard Desmond owner of the Express newspaper (and the majority of local newspapers in the UK), just before overriding a local planning decision that had originally gone against Desmond on a £1bn investment, saving him the cost of a new £45M levy that was coming in the next day.
Jenrick is currently way, way out in front as favourite to be the next Tory leader.
Just as a matter of interest, I decided to see what the Telegraph has to say about him:
![]()
Robert Jenrick
www.telegraph.co.uk
View attachment 36733
View attachment 36734
And Reform (UKIP Part 2) have the BNP's manifesto from back then...They really will say anything to get to the top and sometimes for cash.
UKIP manifesto circa 2004
Rosie hasn't been a happy camper for yonks now. Doesn't agree with starmers mealy mouthed stance on trans women.Oh dear, Rosie Duffield. Not a happy camper.
