• A reminder that if you give a thumbs up or similarly positive reaction to a racist comment you may also receive a ban along with the user that wrote the post.

Israel acting the pup........again.

“ IRAN’S FOREIGN MINISTRY has said Israel was “of course” behind a cyberattack on the Natanz uranium enrichment plant the previous day, and vowed “revenge… in due time”.

“Of course the Zionist regime, with this action, tried to take revenge on the people of Iran for their patience and wise attitude regarding the lifting of (US) sanctions,” spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said at a press conference.

It came after Iran said yesterday that the site was hit by a terrorist act, hours after it said an “accident” had caused a power failure there.”

https://www.thejournal.ie/iran-israel-nuclear-plan-5407126-Apr2021/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
“ Israel appeared to confirm claims that it was behind a cyber-attack on Iran’s main nuclear facility on Sunday, which Tehran’s nuclear energy chief described as an act of terrorism that warranted a response against its perpetrators.
The apparent attack took place hours after officials at the Natanz reactor restarted spinning advanced centrifuges that could speed up the production of enriched uranium, in what had been billed as a pivotal moment in the country’s nuclear programme.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ars-confirm-cyberattack-iran-nuclear-facility
 
There was the famous Stuxnet attack on Iran before which was similar.


Given the recent actions of Russia, China, North Korea, Israel etc......has any state ever actually been charged with a major Cyber Attack on another country ?
 
There was the famous Stuxnet attack on Iran before which was similar.


Given the recent actions of Russia, China, North Korea, Israel etc......has any state ever actually been charged with a major Cyber Attack on another country ?

Cyberwarfare would operate outside the realms of “being charged,”
I would imagine.
 
Cyberwarfare would operate outside the realms of “being charged,”
I would imagine.

I think its jurisdiction is an issue as well.

If i live in Russia and attack your infrastructure that is based in Estonia using tools/methods that are housed in another country (DDOS), then it must be a nightmare to untangle

Consider the impact of what Russia did to Estonia in 2007

“ From 27 April, Estonia was also hit by major cyber-attacks which in some cases lasted weeks.

Online services of Estonian banks, media outlets and government bodies were taken down by unprecedented levels of internet traffic.

Massive waves of spam were sent by botnets and huge amounts of automated online requests swamped servers.

The result for Estonians citizens was that cash machines and online banking services were sporadically out of action; government employees were unable to communicate with each other on email; and newspapers and broadcasters suddenly found they couldn't deliver the news.

Liisa Past was running the op-ed desk of one of Estonia's national newspapers at the time, and remembers how journalists were suddenly unable to upload articles to be printed in time. Today she is a cyber-defence expert at Estonia's state Information System Authority.

"Cyber aggression is very different to kinetic warfare," she explained. "It allows you to create confusion, while staying well below the level of an armed attack. Such attacks are not specific to tensions between the West and Russia. All modern societies are vulnerable."

That means that a hostile country can create disturbance and instability in a Nato country like Estonia, without fear of military retaliation from Nato allies.

Shadowy forces

The alliance's Article Five guarantees that Nato members defend each other, even if that attack is in cyberspace. But Article Five would only be triggered if a cyber-attack results in major loss of life equivalent to traditional military action.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/39655415


“ On 24 January 2008, Dmitri Galushkevich, a student living in Tallinn, was found guilty of participating in the attacks. He was fined 17,500 kroons (approximately US$1,640) for attacking the website of the Estonian Reform Party.[3][15]

As of 13 December 2008, Russian authorities have been consistently denying Estonian law enforcement any investigative cooperation, thus effectively eliminating chances that those of the perpetrators that fall within Russian jurisdiction will be brought to trial.[16]”
 
I would say the Israelies are not to happy with Tucker Carlson and Fox news at the moment.

As long as Isreal has the backing of the biggest super-power in the world it'll continue to act as it pleases with little care for the lives or welfare of the innocent.
 
The nature of cyberwarfare is that it be untraceable.
Add to that the ability to clearly prove it.
Add to that that if you could prove it, it presumes the charged are going to be impacted by it or alter their cyber warfare strategies.

Hands up who sees Russia or Israel or China doing that?
 
Top