The spin is obvious in the headline and you then go onto say that what Ms Coppinger has been through is a "terrible reflection on Gript's readership". It is not the fault of Gript, its editors or its readership but rather of whoever made those threats.
1) What in the headline consistutes spin? Where are the loaded statements and emotive words? What would you change in it to make it a less baised description of what happened?
2) What I said and what's said in the article are not the same thing. The article reported the details, I gave my opinion on it.
3) Noone said it's Gript's fault.

