Matty is clinging on for dear life… ??
Matty is clinging on for dear life… ??If your car was stolen and your next door neighbour was a convicted car thief you probably wouldn't consider it a flimsy reason for them to be a suspect though.
It's not enough to convict, it might not even be enough to arrest, but it's enough to raise a suspicion.
Sherlock Holmes will be quaking in his boots.It’s mad that the TheEarlofPearl, a Glen man who was arguing with the same posters as TheOutdoorThreadmill, and uses similar language in his posts, has disappeared just as Threadmills ban was lifted. I smell a rat, a filthy Blackpool rat….
I haven't changed my position on this at all.Matty is clinging on for dear life… ??
I wasn't impersonating a guard.Impersonating a Garda is a crime but you knew that already....
???I haven't changed my position on this at all.
Who said that?The judge can't and shouldn't sentence someone on the basis of what they might be capable of though. They can only sentence for the crime actually committed.
It's ludicrous to suggest that because the judge gave a suspended sentence that they did or didn't consider him capable of murder.
Oh but you were.I wasn't impersonating a guard.
But you already knew that...
Oh Geez....the stolen car analogy is back.If your car was stolen and your next door neighbour was a convicted car thief you probably wouldn't consider it a flimsy reason for them to be a suspect though.
It's not enough to convict, it might not even be enough to arrest, but it's enough to raise a suspicion.
You did!Who said that?
You said he could be considered a suspect because of it...
Car theft and murder are two entirely different offences so suspecting someone of murder on the basis of a car theft conviction would not be reasonable.Oh Geez....the stolen car analogy is back.
Again no I get it's a reason to suspect he may have stolen the car but it's not reasonable to automatically suspect that he may have stolen a car in an other incident and then deliberately ran a woman over to kill her to boot.
It's obvious from the guards handling of Bailey and the whole case they had him pegged for the murder based on an previously unrelated incident. Which I might add Bailey never ever denied and always was forthcoming on his wrong doings.
The hounding of the guards to get a conviction on Bailey with very flimsy evidence was wrong, suspicion or not. They went out of their way to manifest evidence and get testimonies etc.
Surely they have some protocol regarding suspects. But that went out the window it seems. So yeah flimsy suspicions that led to this unresolved crime to date.
