They elected TD's who said they wouldn't go into coalition with certain parties and lied on their manifestos.The people who elect the TD's are responsible
They elected TD's who said they wouldn't go into coalition with certain parties and lied on their manifestos.The people who elect the TD's are responsible
More nonsense and your usual diatribe. Where did I say there is nothing to see here? As always you jump in head first to a discussion you clearly can't understand.Understanding the written word doesn't appear to be your forte at all Earl.
Whether you want to dismiss it as a mere "telling a porky" or dress it up as a little lie isn't the relevant point. It wasn't a little lie, or a fib, or what's generally understood as a porky. It was a repeated and calculated deceit designed to put him above the law. And everybody knows it.
Now are you going admit that what he did was more than just telling a porky/fib/lie and had implications serious enough that it shows him to be someone unsuited to high public office in this land. Or are you going to pretend there's "nothing to see here"
Some imagination?Jez you have some imagination, making up stuff now. Ah the Shinnerbot creed. You couldn't connect dots if they were footballs and you had a bingo marker
You referred to his behaviour as "telling a porkie." Said nothing else. Without following up that's a "nothing to see here" retort from you. What should happen to English for lying & falsifying bills and documents on his planning application?More nonsense and your usual diatribe. Where did I say there is nothing to see here? As always you jump in head first to a discussion you clearly can't understand.
Yes, some Imagination, from your post I quoted. Never said the below, you imagined it.Some imagination?
English admitted doing all of the above.
That's having "some imagination" is it?
Clearly you set a low bar but explains so much.
And you also think this government are doing a good job
English admitted it.Yes, some Imagination, from your post I quoted. Never said the below, you imagined it.
More nonsense and your usual diatribe. Where did I say there is nothing to see here? As always you jump in head first to a discussion you clearly can't understand.
Oh Dearie me, you are falling apart at the seams now. Go back now and read my post maybe do it twice, it might help.English admitted it.
Think you need to Google the word "imagination."
English admitted it.
Think you need to Google the word "imagination."
Ah come on now lads. You should both know that treehousey never admits he is wrong. And I mean never. Even when it has been proved.Praise indeed from Caesar
You tried to dismiss what the Minister got up to as the mere telling of a porky. I take it you now see the error of your ways and realise that in fact it was the repeated fraudulent filling out of an official declaration. As I said (despite your "So" followed by nonsense) not necessarily worthy of jail time but certainly not something to be dismissed as a mere porky. English has shown himself unfit for high office in this country imho, but you just think him guilty of telling a porky
Nope, I didn't dismiss anything. I said he shouldn't be jailed as the the SSB suggested for telling a porky on a planning application in order to get planning on his own site. You agreed that he shouldn't be jailed as well, did you not? Now you are just chasing your tail because your fellow bot is floundering. You really are pathetic.Praise indeed from Caesar
You tried to dismiss what the Minister got up to as the mere telling of a porky. I take it you now see the error of your ways and realise that in fact it was the repeated fraudulent filling out of an official declaration. As I said (despite your "So" followed by nonsense) not necessarily worthy of jail time but certainly not something to be dismissed as a mere porky. English has shown himself unfit for high office in this country imho, but you just think him guilty of telling a porky