What would your thoughts be on mortgages right now? Fix in for a decent stretch or keep the terms to 4-5 years so you are never on too much of a solo?
Its probably not how banking works but I'd imagine we are an attractive proposition for a bank as the LTV is low and the house qualifies for a green mortgage, which I have at the moment. Maybe they dont give a shite about this stuff and just sell their 'products'?
I think I'd be happy to take a 10 year term if I could get it under 3%
I think it very much depends on your personal circumstances.
I plan on moving once the youngest leaves nursery, which happens to be shortly after my 5 year fix is up, so a longer fix is not on the cards.
Usually once you're below a 50% LTV, the chances of the bank not getting their money back drop fairly close to zero, hence the best rates if you've got vaguely decent credit.
Fundamentally, the ECB is targeting 2% as an inflation rate. The Taylor rule (
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/taylorsrule.asp) with no deviation from long term potential growth rate would have a recommended rate of 4%.
The industry has moved away from it over the past couple of decades, but it's not bad to use it as a rule of thumb.
Fundamentally, if you're targeting a 2% inflation rate, you really should only drop below that level if there's an active problem, otherwise the ECB are literally lending money out at a negative real terms rate* against it's target policy.
EU growth is definitely below what it should be, but the ECB doesn't much account for growth in its policy decisions.
If growth is anaemic and inflation drops, expect the ECB to drop rates again, however there is a floor.
So maybe keep an eye on the inflation and growth rates, if they start to creep back up, then a fix isn't a bad idea. My suspicion is that they'll try and avoid dropping to levels over the past decade. In an ideal scenario, rates would be around 5% so that if the shit hits the fan, you can drop the interest rates a few percent to give the economy a short term boost. At 2%, your scope for doing it is massively reduced, with negative interest rates and QE, which has limited effectiveness (as banks don't pass on the falls in interest rates past 1%)
*to explain what I mean, imagine you lend €100 in Year 0 at 1% with inflation at 2% and none of it is paid back over a 5 year term:
Year 1, you are owed €101, Year 0 €100 is now worth €102
Year 2, you are owed €102, Year 0 €100 is now worth €104
Year 3, you are owed €103, Year 0 €100 is now worth €106
Year 4, you are owed €104, Year 0 €100 is now worth €108
Year 5, you are owed €105, Year 0 €100 is now worth €110
If you're paid back at the end of year 5, what you're getting back is equivalent to less than what you lent out once inflation is accounted for (and no, I'm not going to do the NPV variant of this explanation...).
That loan was a bad investment, you are now poorer.