See my post about Dev being an irrelevance once the Civil war broke out. So I dont accept that anti treaty people were in power. At least not in the sense of those who were in power in the Civil war.And one final point. Anti treaty people were in power within a decade of the end of the civil war. They set about the constitution, setting up the presidency, removing the oath and all that stuff. Partition was nowhere near the top of their agenda.
Dev always had his own agenda. It was only when the Civil war ended and some major figures were eliminated that he became relevant again. Dev didn't give two fucks about the North, never did.
Im nor a fan of Dev or the treaty.



