I went and read it.... you've pulled figures out of your backside. You also fail to mention he thought Limerick should have had a penalty. Not sure if you worked that into your 7 or 8 point Cork win.Malachy Clerkin did a minute by minute analysis on the refereeing performance on Sunday.
![]()
Did the referee cost Cork their Munster title? A foul-by-foul analysis of frees awarded in hurling final
A review of the tape shows that Cork can feel slightly aggrieved by the refereeing - but that wasn’t what cost them their titlewww.irishtimes.com
His findings vindicate Corks view on the referee. Of the 50/50s, missed decisions and incorrect decisions he counted 12-5 in Limericks favor.
Thats a huge factor in determining the outcome.
If it was 12-5 the other way around we would have won by 7 or 8 points!
Just 50/50 parity would have seen us win by 3 or 4 probably.
Which is the way the game was going a couple times until Owens decided to give everything to Limerick for two 10 minute spells.
So in total, 12 dubious calls for Limerick. Thats huge. And thats what we saw but good to have this data to back it up.
And thats before considering Malachy Clerkin is no fan of Cork.
Cork were marginally done by the ref was his take away but you've turned it into the worst case of officiating in the history of the GAA

