I think if it was admitted and hence a retrial was ordered there is automatically less medical evidence.
Yes the damning evidence of the tampon is still there but surely the barrister could raise doubt by merely stating the obvious i.e alcohol and drugs numb the senses so what may excruciatingly painful if it happened in sobriety would be less so giving the cocktail of alcohol and drugs she had consumed, and hence McGregors rough sex explanation becomes somewhat more plausible.
As I said I think this new evidence is bullshit, and you know the law more than me obviously, but I think if this evidence is accepted than in my opinion that could changes things dramatically.
