Did you watch it?Did you do even the most cursory fact check on this streaming pile of dog turd before posting it on here?
Just wondering if you are willfully posting misinformation or just can't be arsed to check your sources...
Did you watch it?Did you do even the most cursory fact check on this streaming pile of dog turd before posting it on here?
Just wondering if you are willfully posting misinformation or just can't be arsed to check your sources...
Why would I watch something that has so comprehensively been debunked?Did you watch it?
If you watch the clip at 15 mins 58 secondsWhy would I watch something that has so comprehensively been debunked?
Once again, did you post it knowing that it is bullshit, or did you just not bother to check if it was bullshit before posting it?
Vaccine deniers are responsible for so many preventable child deaths.
Why are you avoiding my questions?If you watch the clip at 15 mins 58 seconds
David and Brenda McConnell
They weren’t vaccine deniers
I did not watch your clip.If you watch the clip at 15 mins 58 seconds
David and Brenda McConnell
They weren’t vaccine deniers
I don’t make healthcare decisions based on you tube videos posted here, I take advice from my GPAn interesting watch for any new parent.
An hour long but might save some parents a lifetime of illnesses for their child.
Three of her children took the vaccine on that day, and three of them very quickly became ill.I did not watch your clip.
I presume David and Brenda McConnell had a bad outcome for one of their children after taking a vaccine.
Either the vaccine was coincidental to the onset of whatever happened to their kid or very likely that unfortunate child experienced a side effect from taking the medicine.
All medicines have side effects. The truth of vaccines is that it's better that the McConnell's child experienced a negative side effect than it is for the children in the community or immunocompromised people die from whatever it is they were vaccinating against.
The chances of a negative rection are rare but they are not zero and they are listed on the information leaflet for the vaccine and can be explained by a nurse or GP.
i would have no issue saying this to the McConnell's directly although I'm sure it would be a difficult conversation.
If I were running the PROC I would have his thread deleted and give you a permanent ban for posting it. It's far more egregious than any I've seen from any other banned poster and I would equate it to racism in terms of its appropriateness for an Internet forum
Why are you posting misinformation online?Three of her children took the vaccine on that day, and three of them very quickly became ill.
I'd ask you to look at the clip and listen to what the father of the triplets has to say. I'm not so sure you'd have that conversation with him.
Fantastic post.I did not watch your clip.
I presume David and Brenda McConnell had a bad outcome for one of their children after taking a vaccine.
Either the vaccine was coincidental to the onset of whatever happened to their kid or very likely that unfortunate child experienced a side effect from taking the medicine.
All medicines have side effects. The truth of vaccines is that it's better that the McConnell's child experienced a negative side effect than it is for the children in the community or immunocompromised people die from whatever it is they were vaccinating against.
The chances of a negative rection are rare but they are not zero and they are listed on the information leaflet for the vaccine and can be explained by a nurse or GP.
i would have no issue saying this to the McConnell's directly although I'm sure it would be a difficult conversation.
If I were running the PROC I would have his thread deleted and give you a permanent ban for posting it. It's far more egregious than any I've seen from any other banned poster and I would equate it to racism in terms of its appropriateness for an Internet forum
Why does he need to watch the clip, what’s it to you?I'd ask you to look at the clip and listen to what the father of the triplets has to say. I'm not so sure you'd have that conversation with him.
