To be honest I was surprised it was given. Not that it wasn't a penalty (in the box, flight of ball deflected by outstretched hand in an un-natural position) but that it was actually given. Collum thought long and hard before he awarded it.
You really are a pity
You clearly didn't watch it because anyone with half a brain (you ruled out obviously) would have noticed that the ref didn't see the incident, reacted to the shouts and got the nod from the lineman that did see the incident. Took a matter of mere seconds.Did you actually see the match Earl? If you did you'd understand exactly what happened and would have noticed the relatively long delay between the appeal for a penalty and it being awarded. The commentators reckoned that the linesman must have had a word in Collum's ear.
But hey, why would you let the facts get in the way of your misconceptions.
Post where I said otherwise? Take your time nowGlad you now agree that there was a delay in awarding it. You got there in the end
Penalty against Rangers last nite, another kick in the nuts for the conspiracy theorists
www.footballscotland.co.uk
www.heraldscotland.com
Dearie me, you really are a pity but but conspiracyYet more evidence you haven't a clue Earl. Aberdeen should've had not one but TWO penalties. And McGregor should have seen red for yet another of his reckless "tackles" on an opponent.
Stephen Glass reckons Aberdeen should have had another penalty against Rangers
Glass feels his side should've had a spot-kick before Lewis Ferguson equalised from 12 yards in the second half
Should Aberdeen have had two penalties against Rangers?
ABERDEEN battled to a point in a fiercely contested clash with Rangers at Pittodrie last night.
The penalty given was a clear handball by Morelos and yet Tavernier said he didn't think it was a penalty
