PDA

View Full Version : Mick McCarthy


POL
16-02-2006, 09:25 AM
I heard on the radio this morning, that statistically, he is the worst manager in the history of the premiershite.

kipto
16-02-2006, 09:53 AM
hardly suprising..although to be fair he hasn't had a penny to spend on players

Fat Tom
16-02-2006, 10:36 AM
did Paul Jewell when he was over Bradford?

Can't imagine Burley had too much money at Ipwsich first time round?

Swindon, Barnsley?

It just goes to show how shit he is.

Superdave
16-02-2006, 10:50 PM
Paul Jewell kept Bradford up the first season though so thats pretty impressive. Again burley would have done no harm to his average with that 4th place finish a few years back. Whoever was in charge of swindon has got to running McCarthy close though - think they finished the season with over 100 goals conceded. some going.

FL4ZGN
16-02-2006, 11:01 PM
Paul Jewell kept Bradford up the first season though so thats pretty impressive.

The tsunami (toon army) victim had to shave his head on the pitch at the end of the season.

FL4ZGN
16-02-2006, 11:03 PM
I heard on the radio this morning, that statistically, he is the worst manager in the history of the premiershite.


Sure you could probably prove anything with statistics.


Christian Gross comes a close second in my book, and by the way i couldnt understand a word he said either.

qbim3
16-02-2006, 11:40 PM
he needs a nose job

Superdave
17-02-2006, 01:06 AM
The tsunami (toon army) victim had to shave his head on the pitch at the end of the season.


How about Ossie "3-2-5" adiles?

Del
17-02-2006, 01:08 AM
I'm sure if Staunton ever gets a job in the premiership then he could take McCarthy's record

FL4ZGN
17-02-2006, 01:09 AM
How about Ossie "3-2-5" adiles?


At least he did something as a player

raZor
17-02-2006, 04:06 PM
watford were on record for having the lowest points ccumulated in a season i think, probably will get broken by Sunderland though.

Eoin
17-02-2006, 04:15 PM
watford were on record for having the lowest points ccumulated in a season i think, probably will get broken by Sunderland though.

I thought Sunderland were with 19 the season before last.

They could well beat that this year.

Rebelred
17-02-2006, 04:22 PM
. Whoever was in charge of swindon has got to running McCarthy close though - think they finished the season with over 100 goals conceded. some going.
they played 42 games that season,not sure how many points they got.B
ack then,you could be relegated with 40 odd points, now,40 points gets you a decent mid table position

raZor
17-02-2006, 04:28 PM
I thought Sunderland were with 19 the season before last.

They could well beat that this year.

meant as in accumulated, watford wereup for one season only, swindo were up twice and sunderland were doing well enough until they bought foreign mercenaries ike bjorklund, flo and schwarz

Rebelred
17-02-2006, 04:34 PM
meant as in accumulated, watford wereup for one season only, swindo were up twice and sunderland were doing well enough until they bought foreign mercenaries ike bjorklund, flo and schwarz
swindon were only up one season.on their return to division one,they were promptly relegated to division two

janglinjack
17-02-2006, 05:05 PM
I thought Sunderland were with 19 the season before last.

They could well beat that this year.

They were. It was a big moment for me as a hornets fan.

Rebel Yell
17-02-2006, 06:28 PM
They were. It was a big moment for me as a hornets fan.

I knew a Watford fan years ago in School...that was back in the day when they were just after the 'glory' period...after they challenged for the league one year, and FA Cup finalists in 84 !!!! Elton at wembley....and not another gayer in sight!!!!